Grails
  1. Grails
  2. GRAILS-2759

Can the tablePerSubclass mapping definition be extended to allow table per concrete class

    Details

    • Type: New Feature New Feature
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: 2.3-RC1
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      Be nice to not have to map table per concrete class by resorting to Hibernate XML files...

        Issue Links

          Activity

          Hide
          Graeme Rocher added a comment -

          There is no scope / time to resolve these remaining lower priority issues for 1.2 so moving to 1.3

          for 1.2 final only issues considered blocking will now be fixed

          Show
          Graeme Rocher added a comment - There is no scope / time to resolve these remaining lower priority issues for 1.2 so moving to 1.3 for 1.2 final only issues considered blocking will now be fixed
          Hide
          Daniel Plappert added a comment -

          Unfortunately, there aren't any updates for this feature so far.

          Right now, there are only two types of the three supported hierarchy mappings supported by grails:

          • table per class
          • table per subclass

          The more important and high performance mapping "table per concrete class" is not supported yet. I hope, this will be done in the near future, because this is an important hierarchy mapping feature.

          Show
          Daniel Plappert added a comment - Unfortunately, there aren't any updates for this feature so far. Right now, there are only two types of the three supported hierarchy mappings supported by grails: table per class table per subclass The more important and high performance mapping "table per concrete class" is not supported yet. I hope, this will be done in the near future, because this is an important hierarchy mapping feature.
          Hide
          Saminraj added a comment -

          Yes! This is an important feature, in the performance angle looking forward to see this in the upcoming release.

          Show
          Saminraj added a comment - Yes! This is an important feature, in the performance angle looking forward to see this in the upcoming release.
          Hide
          Amit Srivastava added a comment -

          I think it is a very important feature and should be upgraded to 'Major' from a 'Minor'.

          Show
          Amit Srivastava added a comment - I think it is a very important feature and should be upgraded to 'Major' from a 'Minor'.
          Hide
          Klaus Lehner added a comment -

          I would also upgrade that to a 'major'...

          Show
          Klaus Lehner added a comment - I would also upgrade that to a 'major'...
          Hide
          Richard Michael Coo added a comment -

          I agree. This should be a major.

          Show
          Richard Michael Coo added a comment - I agree. This should be a major.
          Show
          Graeme Rocher added a comment - fixed by https://github.com/SpringSource/grails-data-mapping/commit/7f980066283c88bd50a091bbdf0d2a19b6425410

            People

            • Assignee:
              Graeme Rocher
              Reporter:
              Neill Robbins
            • Votes:
              29 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              22 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Last Reviewed:

                Development